How the Apprais.ai Reputation Score works

Every provider profile carries a Reputation Score out of 100. It is our own measure, and it is built entirely from public records, facts the firm publishes about itself, and checks we ran ourselves. No review site's rating feeds into it.

That is a deliberate limitation, so be clear about what the number does and does not tell you. It measures how independently checkable a firm is: whether its credentials, tenure, pricing and identity can be confirmed without taking anyone's word for it. It is not a measure of how satisfied a firm's clients are. For that, read the sources we link on each profile.

Across the 65 active profiles in this directory the median score is 44, the highest is 75 and the lowest is 20. A low score is often a thin record on our side rather than a bad firm, which is why the component breakdown is shown on every profile instead of just the total.

The five components

Each is worth 20 points.

ComponentWhat it scoresWhere it comes from
Credentials
20 pts
Professional credentials recorded for the firm: CIH, P.E., P.G., REPA, state surveying licensure and similar. Three or more scores full marks, two scores 15, one scores 10. State licensing boards and the provider's own published staff credentials.
Track record
20 pts
Years in business from a documented founding year. 35+ scores full marks, then 20, 10, 5 and 1 year step down. A firm whose founding year we could not establish scores zero here, which is a gap in our record rather than a mark against the firm. Company filings and the provider's own about page.
Published pricing
20 pts
Whether the firm publishes a price range at all, scored against the services it actually offers. A surveyor that publishes its one ALTA range scores full marks; it is not penalised for failing to quote a Phase 1 ESA it does not perform. A range only counts when we recorded where the provider published it. The provider's own website. Ranges we estimated ourselves score zero here, and the profile says so.
Verifiable identity
20 pts
Whether a buyer can independently confirm who and where this firm is: working website, phone, street address, headquarters state, plus whether the listing has been claimed and whether we corroborated it ourselves. The provider's own site and structured data, plus our verification pass.
Sourcing depth
20 pts
How many distinct sources back the claims on the profile. This one is about the quality of our record, and we show it rather than hide it: a thinly-sourced profile should be read with more caution than a heavily-sourced one. The profile's own data_sources block.

How we treat third-party review sources

Provider profiles are about real businesses we have no relationship with, and the major review platforms differ in what they permit republishing. We split them into two tiers and treat each accordingly.

Sources we quote exactly

Google. Google publishes Business Profile ratings openly and its own structured-data guidelines assume third-party aggregate ratings get displayed. We show the exact rating and review count, and link to the profile so you can check it. We require both the rating and the review count before publishing either: a rating with no count cannot be tied to a real Business Profile, and we have seen an employee-satisfaction score arrive in that shape. 15 of our 65 active profiles currently carry one.

Sources we assess and link

Yelp, Trustpilot and BBB each license the display of their scores through an API, a widget or an accreditation agreement, and BBB's letter grade and torch are its trademarks. We hold none of those licences, so we do not republish their numbers or their marks. Instead we publish our own three-way classification and link to the source:

Our bandWhat it means
PositiveOur read of the source's signals is favourable overall.
MixedMeaningfully divided, or good with notable complaints.
NegativeOur read of the source's signals is unfavourable overall.
Not enough reviews Fewer than 3 reviews, so we publish no band either way: a perfect score from two reviews is noise, and so is a bad one.

The band is our editorial judgement about the source's signals, not that source's rating restated, and we label it "our assessment" everywhere it appears. Three buckets over a five-point scale is coarse on purpose: it tells you what you need to decide whether to go read the reviews, without reproducing the platform's score. For BBB we classify from accreditation status, complaint volume and complaint resolution, never from the letter grade.

Current coverage: Yelp 7, Trustpilot 1 . No assessments recorded yet for BBB or Glassdoor.

Employee reviews are shown separately

Glassdoor measures what staff say about working somewhere, which is not a proxy for what clients say about the work. Where we have assessed it, it appears under its own "Employee sentiment" heading and never contributes to the Reputation Score. We separate it because the two have been confused before, including by us: eight profiles on this site once carried a rating with no review count in a badge styled as a customer rating, and on the one we could trace exactly, the figure turned out to be the firm's Glassdoor employee score. We found them, removed them, and now require both a rating and a count so the shape cannot recur.

What we do not publish

Corrections

If a score, an assessment or any fact on your profile is wrong, tell us and we will fix it. Claim your listing to correct the underlying data. Every component above is recalculated from that data on the next build, so a correction moves the score automatically.